The Help Review

Tate Taylor’s adaptation of Kathryn Stockett’s novel ‘The Help’ is a big puddle of emotion elegantly crafted into a very watchable film. I have to admit it wasn’t a film that necessarily appealed to me at first, however it’s a very accessible and no frills experience. 

The story comes from Stockett’s 2009 novel about a budding reporter, Skeeter who finds her first story in the lives of the hired ‘help’. The story is set in the early 1960’s where all the hired help were black woman who were oppressed and treated no more than slaves. Skeeter follows the lives of two woman she knows; Aibileen and Minny who struggle daily against segregation and the wrath of their white female masters. 

The film goes for the heartstrings and it makes no bones about it. Director Tate Taylor builds us up with loveable characters and takes his time to gently knock us down with their tragedy. 

Emma Stone plays a convincing Skeeter whose character makes an interesting journey from naive graduate to an employable writer. Her affection and hope for Aibileen and Minny is subtle and touching. There’s plenty of comedy provided from Octavia Spencer’s sassy Minny, who only just avoids falling into caricature and cliche. 

However it’s Jessica Chastain’s unstable Celia Foote that captured my heart. Foote is a troubled woman who finds herself alienated from her new found social class but finds friendship in her hired help Minny. Chastain’s portrayal is authentic and heart-warmingly funny. 

This film is a great story that gives a warm fuzzy feeling inside...

However for me it raises questions about the nature of emotion in film and why as an audience member we become so involved. Is it the story or the film that creates the emotion? I would argue that in this case it’s the story that creates the emotion and the film is a medium and support for it. Does this mean it’s a good film then? I would argue that it’s doing it’s job well as being a medium for storytelling but in terms of looking at film making as a craft and art form it comes across as being very middle of the road. 

The Ides of March Review

Let’s not beat around the bush here, American politics and the hype around it’s inhabitants could be likened to a circus. It’s the whole Campaign trail thing that being British we don’t get or understand. It makes sense in America because it’s such a big country and divided by state lines but from the outside it just comes across a bit creepy, ‘Roll up, roll up come and see the latest god loving, silver haired pillock with unnatural white dentures.’ 

So as a British viewer of George Clooney’s ‘The Ides of March’ I’m intrigued to go behind the scenes of one of these campaigns, to see into the world of the consultants pulling the strings. What this film does is very clever! It takes it’s audience into the heart of the circus and although it’s showing us something that we’re all guessing is going on anyway (cover ups blackmail etc.), the film gives us something human. That’s the thing these campaigns always miss, they go for the spin and the staged photos, but the rawness of what it takes to be a politician is tidily tucked away, just off to the side of the stage. That’s where this film takes place, at the side of the stage with the political consultants puppeteering the whole operation. Steven is one of Governor Morris’ consultants and he becomes caught up in the fast moving and unforgiving world of the ‘campaign’. Ryan Gosling’s Steven is smart and suave yet his unshakable faith in Morris reveals a hidden naivety to this character.  He is warned by a reporter that his boss Morris (Clooney) will ‘let him down eventually’ because he’s a politician and ‘they all do sooner or later’. 

There’s some first rate acting from Philip Seymour Hoffman and Paul Giamatti as they become embroiled in an odd political triangle with Steven stuck in the middle. However it’s the influence of a seductive intern that acts as the trigger for the drama in the film. Her after hours shenanigans leads to all sorts of trouble. The result of this produces a hefty dichotomy for poor old Steven. Will faith alone get Morris to the White House?

If you’re into political thrillers and have enjoyed any of Borgen lately then this one is for you. 

Chronicle Review

Science Fiction has long been obsessed with normal people becoming overnight superheroes after gaining superpowers through a freak accident. Radioactive spiders, fallen space ships and genetic experiments gone wrong have been the catalyst for many a graphic novel turned blockbuster. So what can Josh Trank’s new film Chronicle bring to this big and well used table?

Well for a start a beguiling film that features hand-held cameras, no scientific spiel and a serendipitous absensce of a soundtrack. 

Chronicle is shot on hand-held cameras, which gives the film a gritty naturalism usually absent in Sci-Fi thrillers. Think Cloverfield bumping into X-Men in a cinema playing a US Teen comedy. The main protagonist Andrew films much of the action on his new camera, capturing his mother’s terminal illness, father’s abuse and high school drama. However the footage gets interesting when he stumbles across a mysterious object in the ground while at a party with his older and cooler cousin Matt and high school jock Steve. The find has a profound effect on the three characters when they discover they have developed incredible powers including flight, telekinesis and supernatural speed. 

The POV style plus superb acting from Dane Dehaan and co make this discovery believable and watchable for the audience. You get a sense of this being a natural response from teenagers suddenly finding out they have new superpowers. The plot darkens as they learn to control and strengthen their powers. Andrew’s dysfunctional home life begins to affect the way he uses and manipulates his new found kudos. 

This film is clever and unpredictable right up until the last twenty minutes when unfortunately it loses some of it’s maturity. The intelligent progression of character and plot suddenly end in a drawn out hollywood style smash em up up fight and things get a bit boring. 

Obstensibly if you’re a Sci-Fi fan this film will probably impress you, however if you’re yet to be convinced, you might want to wait for the next Trank film.